|
|
Tramadol Research Reports
Tramadol drug is used for pain relief Tramadol (generic for Ultram) is a prescription medication used for the management of moderate to moderately severe pain. TramadolŪ has been prescribed to more than 55 million patients worldwide; UltramŪ has been prescribed to more than 21 million patients in the U.S.
Drug Store 4 U sells Tramadol online. Their Price:
| Product | Dosage | Quantity | Price(USD) | Buy Now |
| Tramadol | 50 mg | 30 (Tabs) | $63.30 | Tramadol |
| Tramadol | 50 mg | 90 (Tabs) | $89.90 | Tramadol |
| Tramadol | 50 mg | 180 (Tabs) | $109.90 | Tramadol |
Rates of abuse of tramadol remain unchanged with the
introduction of new branded and generic products: results of an abuse monitoring
system, 1994-2004.
Cicero TJ, Inciardi JA, Adams EH, Geller A, Senay EC, Woody GE, Munoz A.
Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis,
MO, USA.
PURPOSE: The analgesic Tramadol HCl (Ultramtrade mark) was approved in 1994 as a
non-scheduled drug under the CSA provided that a novel risk-management program
would be developed by an Independent Steering Committee (ISC). The
risk-management program began in 1995 with the launch of Ultram, and has been
modified over the past decade to accommodate Ultracet (Ultram and acetaminophen)
in 2001 and generic tramadol in 2002. This provided a unique opportunity to
study the potential changes in abuse as the generic and combination products
became available. METHODS: To proactively detect cases of abuse and diversion,
the ISC developed a comprehensive questionnaire which was completed quarterly by
an extensive network of drug abuse experts (n = 309) and police agencies (n =
100) who were asked to indicate how many diversion cases involving Ultram,
Ultracet, and generic tramadol were identified during the preceding 3 months and
what were the ten most commonly diverted drugs in their catchment area during
that period. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The data generated demonstrate that the
abuse of tramadol remained very low despite new branded and generic
formulations. Contrary to the hypothesis that cheaper generic drugs would lead
to higher rates of abuse, we found no increase in abuse with the introduction of
generic tramadol. Ultracet abuse rates, unlike those found with other widely
used hydrocodone and oxycodone combination products, have been even lower than
that observed for tramadol. Since the FDA has now mandated that proactive
risk-management plans be implemented for new drugs, the tramadol risk-management
plan may be useful as a prototypic model which can be modified to accommodate
other drugs with abuse potential. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15892169&query_hl=2
Synergic Antinociceptive Interaction between Tramadol and
Gabapentin after Local, Spinal and Systemic Administration.
Granados-Soto V, Arguelles CF.
Departamento de Farmacobiologia, Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados,
Coapa, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
The possible interaction between tramadol and gabapentin on formalin-induced
nociception in the rat was assessed. Tramadol, gabapentin or a fixed-dose ratio
combination of gabapentin and tramadol were administered peripherally, spinally
and orally to rats, and the antinociceptive effect was determined in the 1%
formalin test. Isobolographic analyses were used to define the nature of the
interactions between drugs. Tramadol, gabapentin and tramadol-gabapentin
combinations produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect when administered
locally, spinally or orally. ED(30) values were estimated for the individual
drugs and isobolograms were constructed. Theoretical ED(30) values for the
combination estimated from the isobolograms were 126.8 +/- 11.1 mug/paw, 23.1
+/- 2.6 mug/rat, and 2.23 +/- 0.32 mg/kg for the local, intrathecal and oral
routes, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the actually
observed ED(30) values which were 13.3 +/- 2.1 mug/paw, 8.1 +/- 0.6 mug/rat and
0.71 +/- 0.10 mg/kg, indicating a synergistic interaction. Although efficacy was
not improved, local peripheral administration resulted in the highest increase
in potency, being about tenfold. Spinal and systemic administration increased
potency threefold. Data indicate that low doses of the tramadol-gabapentin
combination can interact synergistically to reverse formalin-induced nociception
and may represent a therapeutic advantage for clinical treatment of inflammatory
pain. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15886505&query_hl=2
Liver and kidney toxicity in chronic use of opioids: An
experimental long term treatment model.
Atici S, Cinel I, Cinel L, Doruk N, Eskandari G, Oral U.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, atici@mersin.edu.tr.
In this study, histopathological and biochemical changes due to chronic usage of
morphine or tramadol in liver and kidney were assessed in rats. Thirty male
Wistar rats (180-220 g) were included and divided into three groups. Normal
saline (1 ml) was given intraperitoneally as placebo in the control group (n =
10). Morphine group (n = 10) received morphine intraperitoneally at a dose of 4,
8, 10 mg/kg/day in the first, second and the third ten days of the study,
respectively. Tramadol group (n = 10), received the drug intraperitoneally at
doses of 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day in the first, second and the third ten days of
the study, respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine
aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinin, blood urea
nitrogen (BUN) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured in the serum.
Liver and kidney specimens were evaluated by light microscopy. Serum ALT, AST,
LDH, BUN and creatinin levels were significantly higher in morphine group
compared to the control group. Serum LDH, BUN and creatinin levels were
significantly increased in the morphine group compared to the tramadol group.
The mean MDA level was significantly higher in morphine group compared to the
tramadol and control groups (P 0.05). Light microscopy revealed severe
centrolobular congestion and focal necrosis in the liver of morphine and
tramadol groups, but perivenular necrosis was present only in the morphine
group. The main histopathologic finding was vacuolization in tubular cells in
morphine and tramadol groups. Our findings pointed out the risk of increased
lipid peroxidation, hepatic and renal damage due to long term use of opioids,
especially morphine. Although opioids are reported to be effective in pain
management, their toxic effects should be kept in mind during chronic usage.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15886461&query_hl=2
Tramadol effect(1) |
Tramadol effect(2) |
Tramadol effect(3) |
Tramadol effect(4) |
Tramadol effect(4)
Tramadol effect(5) |
Tramadol effect(6) |
Tramadol effect(7) |
Tramadol effect(8) |
Tramadol effect(9)
Tramadol effect(11) |
Tramadol effect(12) |
Tramadol effect(13) |
Tramadol effect(14)
Tramadol effect(15) |
Tramadol effect(16) |
Tramadol effect(17) |
Tramadol effect(18)
Tramadol effect(19) |
Tramadol effect(20) |
Tramadol effect(21) |
Tramadol effect(22)
|